Executive stock options plans and its effect on short-run corporate performance (IR)

Ismail Zuriadah, Mahjom Nurhanie, Hashim Emilda,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	HB Economic Theory
ISSN :	2232-0032
Main Author :	Ismail Zuriadah, Mahjom Nurhanie, Hashim Emilda,
Title :	Executive stock options plans and its effect on short-run corporate performance (IR)

Place of Production :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Year of Publication :	2016
PDF Full Text :	Login required to access this item.

Full Text :

This paper examines the effect of executive stock option plans on corporate performance. By using a standard event study methodology for Malaysian listed firms, the study findings reveal a negative share returns before announcement day and following with a positive effect as consistent result which reported in past studies. However, the announcement for executive stock option plans does not carry any surprise event to the Malaysia capital market. In short, the weak share price reaction before the event day confirmed that early information releases before official announcement could be rules out. There is also a possibly an opportunistic behavior among executive levels that used stock option plans as a tool for increasing their personal wealth. Then, they would be selectively delayed bad news and released good news in order to lessen the share prices before official announcement and upward the share prices later. Furthermore, the insignificant effect in returns at the event day may perhaps due to the beneficial groups of stock options are all for internal staffs. Therefore, the market might anticipate that news of stock option plans do not produce good impact to the market. From this result, it also provides an idea that granting executive stock option plans carry less signaling impact to the market. Moreover, a loss in returns for short-run firm performance for beneficial groups could be explained as large fraction of stock options are an immediate cost to shareholders.

References

1. Aboody, D. and Kasznik, R. (2000). CEO stock option awards and corporate voluntary disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29, 73-100. 2. Balsam,S. Gifford,R. And Kim, S. (2007). The effect of stock option grants on voluntary employee turnover. Review of Accounting and Finance, 6 (1). 5-14. 3. Brickley, J., Bhagat, S and Lease, R. (1985). The impact of long-range managerial compensation plans on shareholder wealth. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 115-129. 4. Brown, S. and Warner, J. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics 14,3- 31. 5. Cohen, R. B., Hall B. J. and Viceira,L. M. (2000). Do executive stock options encourage risk-taking? Working Paper, Harvard Business School. 6. Conyon, M.J. and Leech, D. (1994). Top pay, company performance and corporate governance. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 56 (3), 229-247. 7. Core J.E. and Guay W.R. (2001). Stock option plans for non-executive employees. Journal of Financial Economics, 61 (2). 253-287. 8. Cox, D. R. and David R. P. (1994). Stock returns following large one- day declines: Evidence on short-term reversals and longer-term performance. Journal of Finance 49, 255-267. 9. Cowan, A.R. (1992). Non-parametric event study tests. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accouning 2, 343-358. 10. DeBondt, W. F. M and Richard H. T. (1985). Does the stock market overreact? Journal of Finance 40, 793-805. 11. DeFusco. R., Johnson, R. and Zorn, T. J. (1990). The effect of executive stock option plans on stockholders and bondholders. 45(2), 617-627. 12. Dennis, D.J., Denis,D.K. and Sarin, A. (1997). Ownership structure and top executive turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 45, 193-221. 13. Ding,D.K and Qian, S. (2001). Causes and effect of stock option plans: Evidences from Singapore. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9,563-599. 14. Duffhues,P. Kabir,R. Mertens, G. and Roosenboom, P. (2003). Employee stock option grants and firm performance in the Netherlands, Bedrijsskunde 75, 667-678. 15. Duffhues P. And Kabir,R. (2008). Is the pay-performance relationship always positive? Evidence from the Netherlands. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 1,45-60. 16. Fan,J.P.H., Wong,T.J. and Zhang,T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatize firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 1-3. 17. Fee,C.E and Hadlock, C.J. (2003). Raids, rewards and reputations in the market for managerial talent. Review of Financial Studies 16(4),1315-1357. 18. Gaver, J., Gaver, K. (1993). Additional evidence on the association between the investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Accounting and economics 16, 125–160. 19. Gerety, M., Hoi, C. K. and Robin, A. (2001). Do shareholders benefit from the adoption of incentive pay for directors?. Financial Management, 30, 45–61. 20. Goyal.V.K. and Park,C.W. (2002). Board leadership structure and CEO turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance 8,49-66. 21. Hassan, H and Y, Hoshino. (2007). The performance Impacts of stock options in Japan. Japanese Journal of Administrative Science 20, 27-41. 22. Hillegeist, S. A. and Penalva, F.. (2004). Stock option incentives and firm performance, IESE Business School, University of Navarra Working Paper No 535. 23. Huson, M.R. Parrino,R. and Starks, L.T. (2001). Internal monitoring mechanisms and CEO turnover: A long term perspective. The Journal of Finance 56(6). 2265-2297. 24. Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. 25. Kang, J.K. and Shivdani, A. (1995). Firm Performance, corporate governance and top executive turnover in Japan. Journal in Financial Economics, 38. 29-58. 26. Kato, H.K., Lemmon, M., Luo, M. And Schallheim, J. (2005). An empirical examination of the costs and benefits of executive stock options: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Financial Economics 78, 435–461. 27. Langmann, C. (2007). Stock Market Reaction and Stock Option Plans: Evidence from Germany. SBR (59), 85-106. 28. Ikaheimo, S.Kjellman, A. Holmberg, J.& Jussila, S. (2004)Employee Stock Option Plan and Stock Market reaction: Evidence from Finland, The European Journal of Finance,10 (2), 105-122. 29. Ittner, C.D., Lambert, R.A and Larcker, D. F. (2003). The structure and performance consequences of equity grants to employees of new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 34. 89–127. 30. Matsuura, Y. (2003). The market reaction to stock option plan introduction in Japan. Journal of Comparative International Management, 6(1). Retrieved from http://journals.hil.unb.ca/index.php/JCIM/article/view/441/733. 31. Maury,B. (2006). Corporate performance, corporate governance and top executive turnover in Findland. European Financial Management 12, 221-248. 32. Mehran, H. (1995). Executive compensation structure, ownership and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 163-184. 33. Murphy, K. (1990). CEO incentives: it's not how much you pay, but how? Harvard Business Review 3, May-June 1990. 34. Obiyathulla, I. B., Sharifah Raihan S,M. Z., Mohd Eskandar S.M.R. and Azhar M. (2009). Granting employee stock options (ESOs), market reaction and firm performance. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance 5 (1), 117–138. 35. Oyer, Paul & Schaefer, Scott. (2005). Why do some firms give stock options to all employees? An empirical examination of alternative theories. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(1), 99-133. 36. Rajgopal, S. and T. Shevlin. (2002). Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics (33)2: 145-171. 37. Sanders, W.M.G. and Hambrick. D.C. (2007). Swinging for the Fences: The effects of CEO stock options on company risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal 50, 1055-1078. 38. Selvarajan, T. T. , Ramamoorthy, N. , Flood , P. C. & Rowley, P. (2006). Employee stock option plans and employee attitudes: A test of extrinsic versus intrinsic , models. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(5/6), 245-254. 39. Sesil, J.C., Kroumova, M.K., Blasi, J.R. and Kruse, D. L. (2002). Broad-based employee stock options in U.S new economy firms. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(2). 273-294. 40. Sesil, J.C. Kroumova, M.K. Kruse, D.L. & Blasi, J.R. (2005). Broadbased employee stock option plans in the US: Company performance and characteristics. Working Paper Series in Human Resource Management. Downloaded available at http://chrs.rutgers.edu/pub_documents/BBESOinUSCP%26C.pdf. 41. Strong, N. (1992). Modelling abnormal returns: A review article. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 19(4). 533–553. 42. Tehranian, H.,& Waegelein, J. (1985). Market reaction to short-term executive compensation plan adoption. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 131-144. 43. Triki, T. and Ureche-Rangau, L. (2012). Stock options and firm performance: New evidence from the french market. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 23 (2), 154–185. 44. Yermack, D. (1997). Good timing: CEO stock option awards and company news announcements. The Journal of Finance, 52( 2), 449-476. 45. Yeo, G. H. H., Chen, S. S., Ho, K. W., & Lee, C. (1999). Effects of executive share option plans on shareholder wealth and firm performance: The Singapore evidence. Financial Review, 34(2), 1-20.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page